[Seymour Dupa <grumpy_44134@xxxxxxxxx>]

-------------------
The Ethereal project is being continued at a new site.  Please go to
http://www.wireshark.org and subscribe to wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
Don't forget to unsubscribe from this list at
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users
-------------------

I understand more now.

Thank you.

--- Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -------------------
> The Ethereal project is being continued at a new
> site.  Please go to
> http://www.wireshark.org and subscribe to
> wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
> Don't forget to unsubscribe from this list at
>
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users
> -------------------
> 
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:39:44AM -0700, Gerald
> Combs wrote:
> > Well, considering that the original message seems
> to have originated
> > from a system we have no control over:
> > 
> > Received: from mail pickup service by
> mailserver.solutionnet.net with
> > 	Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:28:53
> +0530
> > 
> > and then delivered through a mailing list on
> _another_ server which may
> > no longer be maintained, I'm not sure what sort of
> useful answer we can
> > give other than to either ignore the messages,
> filter them out, or
> > unsubscribe from the list.
> > 
> > As far as I know, there is no machine in the
> ethereal.com domain named
> > "mailserver".  There is also no "the rule2" which
> can be violated.
> > 
> > Seymour Dupa wrote:
> > > -------------------
> > > The Ethereal project is being continued at a new
> site.  Please go to
> > > http://www.wireshark.org and subscribe to
> wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
> > > Don't forget to unsubscribe from this list at
> > >
>
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users
> > > -------------------
> > > 
> > > Thank you for a non-answer.
> > > 
> > > --- Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> Ignore the rule problem and do what the remark
> above
> > >> each message says.
> 
> Sigh. It is completely possible that one of the
> mailman rules drops the
> mail. It is also a fact that I don't care and that
> any time spent on
> investigating the problem is *a complete waste of
> time* (thus the "Sigh"
> at the beginning of my answer, which in and by
> itself feels like a waste
> of time).
> 
> Let me just give you a picture of what happended:
> 
> You have a bank where they have some sort of mailbox
> where you can deposit
> money transaction orders in case you come at non
> opening hours. 
> One day you come along and want to put a large
> envelope in there with
> lots and lots of orders. It's so big that it doesn't
> fit into the
> mailbox slot. There's also a sign saying that the
> bank has moved and
> that it isn't doing any further business in this
> area and it isn't
> looking into this specific mailbox any more. That's
> the moment when you
> come into the play and complain that your envelope
> doesn't fit into the
> mailbox slot - not caring that *even if you managed
> to get the envelope
> in there* the bank wouldn't receive that envelope.
> 
> So, please send your mail to the new address, and in
> case that the new
> setup still has the problem *then* please report it
> for the new site and
> we will investigate - we have a very good record of
> caring about that
> kind of problems. So, just to return the courtesy to
> you: Thanks for
> reporting a non-problem.
> 
> Regards
>          Joerg
> 
> -- 
> Joerg Mayer                                         
>  <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
> We are stuck with technology when what we really
> want is just stuff that
> works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead
> of technology.
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-users mailing list
> Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users
> 


Endings must come
before new beginnings.
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-users mailing list
Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users