Ethereal-users: Re: [Ethereal-users] Ethereal port naming question.

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 23:18:33 +0200
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 02:00:40PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
> I don't know whether "X" at the beginning of the name would be best, 
> though; these days, "X" at the beginning of an new application's name 
> isn't used a lot to indicate that it has an X11-based GUI, but in the 
> old days of X11, that was used (nowadays, the letters "G" and "K" tend 
> to be the ones used for that :-)), so it *might* be a bit confusing. 
> I'm not sure what'd be a better version, other than, say, "MacWireshark" 
> (although if, as, and when we have an official Aqua-based release, we'll 
> probably just call it "Wireshark", just as we call the Windows version 
> "Wireshark" and would probably continue to do so even if it didn't use 
> any GTK+ code).

aquashark

 ciao
    Joerg
-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-users mailing list
Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users