Ethereal-users: Re: [Ethereal-users] Frames and timestamps

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: David López Pérez <dalopezperez@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:00:39 +0000
Hello

I'm working in my final project, it's:
MEASURING ROUND TRIP TIMES TO DETERMINE THE DISTANCE BETWEEN WLAN NODES

It's very very important for me knows the time at which the packets arrive at the wlan card.

Now, I have this problem.

For example, sometimes the ICMP request is timestamped later than the ICMP reply.

Do you know how i can resolve this problem?

I'm using Windows XP Home and toshiba m70-155 lap top.

Maybe is better use other OS? For example WindowsXP Professional.






From: Guy Harris <gharris@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Ethereal user support <ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Ethereal user support <ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-users] Frames and timestamps
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:34:56 -0800

David L�pez P�rez wrote:

Why  the frames and the timetamps aren't in the same order?

For example, in this figure:
Why  the frame 38 is before in time than the frame 39?
 -- frame 38 --> 4.781393s
 -- frame 39 --> 4.781360s

Because some OSes apparently have the annoying habit of not delivering packets to the mechanism used by libpcap in the order in which they're time-stamped (note that the time at which a packet is time-stamped could be different from the time at which it arrived at the host's network adapter).

(Is this Linux?  Is it on a multiprocessor machine?)
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-users mailing list
Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users