This device supports the MD5 passwords too. I think it's something like "no-name firmware writer feature", because this is not first device which uses such OID I have tested (interestingly, not the same vendor and not the same "look", but almost similar firmware). It looks like selfmade/homemade pre-H.235 implementation of secure passwords used by vendors of very cheap H.323 analog terminals.
Thank you for your replies, I just wanted to be sure this OID is not correct.
PV
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ethereal-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:ethereal-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Andreas Sikkema
> Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 12:22 PM
> To: Ethereal user support
> Subject: RE: [Ethereal-users] Re: OFFTOPIC - unknown OID in
> H.235 CryptoToken
>
> ethereal-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > it would be unlikely that htat device would be able to interoperate
> > on the h235 layer properly with any other implementation that does
> > not implement the same bug, or maybe that vendor produces both the
> > endpoint implementations and dont want to interoperate and they
> > were too lazy to allocate a proper private enterprise oid and just
> > picked an "impossible" itu H. oid for their private data?
>
> Knowing embedded software developers I'd say it is not a
> bug, but a "feature". If this is the only OID they supply,
> then you're dealing with a supplier without clue ;-)
>
> --
> Andreas Sikkema bbned NV
> Van Vollenhovenstraat 3 3016 BE Rotterdam
> t: +31 (0)10 2245544 f: +31 (0)10 413 65 45
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-users mailing list
> Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users
>