I am attempting to compile ethereal-0.10.12 under Win32.
I am using WinPCap 3.1 beta 4 Developer's Pack and MSVC++6.
I am able to compile 0.10.12 successfully using the WinPCap
3.0 Dev Pack.
This is what happens when running 'nmake -f Makefile.nmake':
*********************************
sctp_assoc_analyse.c
sctp_chunk_stat_dlg.c
sctp_chunk_stat.c
sctp_stat_dlg.c
sip_stat.c
smb_stat.c
tcp_graph.c
voip_calls_dlg.c
wsp_stat.c
Generating Code...
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Program Files\Microsoft
Visual Studio\VC98\bin\cl.exe"' : return code '0x2'
Stop.
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Program Files\Microsoft
Visual Studio\VC98\bin\NMAKE.EXE"' : return code '0x2'
Stop.
*********************************
However, simply trying 'nmake -f Makefile.nmake' again seems
to bypass the above error and move on to the following error:
*********************************
capture_if_details_dlg.c
C:\ethereal-win32-libs\WPdpack\include\Packet32.h(204) :
error C2079: 'IPAddress' uses undefined struct 'sockaddr_storage'
C:\ethereal-win32-libs\WPdpack\include\Packet32.h(205) :
error C2079: 'SubnetMask' uses undefined struct 'sockaddr_storage'
C:\ethereal-win32-libs\WPdpack\include\Packet32.h(206) :
error C2079: 'Broadcast' uses undefined struct 'sockaddr_storage'
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cl' : return code '0x2'
Stop.
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Program Files\Microsoft
Visual Studio\VC98\bin\NMAKE.EXE"' : returncode '0x2'
Stop.
*********************************
Looks like capture_if_details_dlg.c includes Packet32.h and
the relevant part of Packet32.h looks like:
**********************************
/*!
\brief Addresses of a network adapter.
This structure is used by the PacketGetNetInfoEx()
function to return the IP addresses associated with
an adapter.
*/
typedef struct npf_if_addr {
struct sockaddr_storage IPAddress; ///<
IP address.
struct sockaddr_storage SubnetMask; ///<
Netmask for that address.
struct sockaddr_storage Broadcast; ///<
Broadcast address.
}npf_if_addr;
************************************
Anyone have any ideas on the problem? Ulf?
(This is the same issue reported earlier this week, but I
thought I would be more precise in this problem report than the last one...)
Ross