[ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Do you have an example capture showing this failure?
And also, for the developers that dont have the standard handy, a link
to the protocol spec?



On 4/20/05, Andreas Malataras <malataras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello list,
> 
> using the latest version of ethereal (0.10.10), I
> noticed
> that there is a problem in parsing of option 82 (Agent
> Information Option)in DHCP packets.
> 
> Instead of displaying the "Agent Remote ID"
> sub-option,
> there is the following message:
> "Suboption 2: no room left in option for suboption
> value"
> 
> "Agent Circuit ID" suboption is correctly displayed.
> 
> I hope that developers can check and fix this minor problem.
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-users mailing list
> Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users
>