["Kodali, Venkata Krishna Rao (Krishna)" <vkodali@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Please unsubscribe my mail Id from this list. 
I keep-on requesting for this process and could not success.

Please unsubscribe me as early as possible.

Thanks,
Krishna.

-----Original Message-----
From: ethereal-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ethereal-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
ethereal-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 10:30 PM
To: ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Ethereal-users Digest, Vol 24, Issue 10


Send Ethereal-users mailing list submissions to
	ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	ethereal-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
	ethereal-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Ethereal-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Etherreal Window Font (Ulf Lamping)
   2. Re: One feature I'd *LOVE* to see in	Ethereal: T	CPbounce
      diagram a la Packetyzer (Ulf Lamping)
   3. Using ethereal by non-root linux user (Johnny Choque)
   4. Capture problems (Archie Winful)
   5. Re: Using ethereal by non-root linux user (Breen Mullins)
   6. Newbie Dissector question (linux lover)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:33:33 +0200
From: Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-users] Etherreal Window Font
To: dannyng@xxxxxxxxxxx, ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <4254E24D.3090006@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Danny Ng HC wrote:

>Hi UlfLamping,
>
>Took your advice on reloading.  Did un-install Ethereal verion 0.10.8 and
>loaded latest version 0.10.10 instead and the problem is absent.
>Thanks.
>
>
>Danny
>
>  
>
Hi Danny!

Glad to hear that this solved your problem, still uncertain why it
wasn't working for you.

Regards, ULFL

P.S: It's a good idea to send such mails to the list and not
individuals, so people can search in the lists archive and find
question/solution/solved mails if they have a similar problem.



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:49:39 +0200
From: Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-users] One feature I'd *LOVE* to see in
	Ethereal: T	CPbounce diagram a la Packetyzer
To: Ethereal user support <ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <4254E613.5000707@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi!

Francisco Alcoba (TS/EEM) wrote:

>Hi,
>The code is general, it is not tied to VoIP analysis. 
>
I'm very glad to hear this, as duplicated code for different stats is
quite common, making it hard to maintain :-(

>I am writing a function
>to plot general diagrams that I hope I can get ready in a while. My idea
is, rather
>than using it from a specific protocol, calling it from the main window to
graph
>the displayed packets. The disadvantage there is that you will have no such
a thing
>as a protocol specific context menu option -like "go to the segment this
packet is
>acking"-; you will, however, be able to focus the main window on a packet
by clicking
>on it, and there you can have those options. You will have also general
packet information
>on the graph, not specific for one protocol level.
>  
>
In the long term we might need both. I "often" have to deal with TCP
problems, so a dedicated TCP graph of that kind might be useful too.

However, the graph you describe seems to be useful too, so having both
general and specific graphs for different purposes seems to be a good idea.

>The main advantage, of course, is that it should be possible to make graphs
of 
>arbitrary packet combinations. I attach a sample of how it will -I hope-
look.
>
>Anyway, using it for something protocol-specific should be quite
straightforward -thanks
>to Alejandro-.
>  
>
Thanks from me too.

>Regards,
>
>  Francisco 
>
>  
>
As the VoIP graph is looking very nice and seems to be useful (but I
don't use VoIP), having some more sophisticated "stats" in a general
purpose way is the way we should go in my eyes.

Regards, ULFL

P.S: Please keep an eye on GUI consistency, e.g. the button shouldn't be
called "Write to file" but "Save As" as in some other dialogs.

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ethereal-users mailing list
>Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users
>  
>



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:02:51 +0200
From: "Johnny Choque" <jchoque@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Ethereal-users] Using ethereal by non-root linux user
To: <ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <200504071145.j37BjXcA015610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

Hi all,

I am using ethereal in RedHat linux and all is working well using ethereal
with root user but I need to use ethereal by non-root user for particular
reasons. Please someone tell me how to configure my linux box for use
ethereal with non-root user? I already used sudo but it does not work.

Thanks,

Johnny



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:04:37 +0100 
From: Archie Winful <Archie.Winful@xxxxxx>
Subject: [Ethereal-users] Capture problems
To: "'ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx'" <ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
	<9F93A8A3ED33D71197BC00080255689602426BA2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi,
I've been running packet captures on Ethereal and I've noticed an odd
problem. I recently had to have Windows 2000 Server installed in my laptop
(with the latest patch). I've also installed and reinstalled WinPcap_3. I
find that whenever I run a packet capture with no filters at all, I cannot
see any of the packets going out from my machine apart from ARPs and
broadcasts. I can see all the responses coming back to my IP address though.
Any ideas on what's going wrong here?

Thanks,
Archie Winful


**********************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may also be 
subject to legal privilege.  It is intended only for the recipient(s) named 
above.  If you are not named above as a recipient, you must not read, 
copy, disclose, forward or otherwise use the information contained in 
this e-mail.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the 
sender (whose contact details are above) immediately by reply e-mail 
and delete the message and any attachments without retaining copies.
**********************************************************************


This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by the Cable & Wireless e-mail
security system - powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a
proactive managed e-mail security service,  visit
http://www.cw.com/uk/emailprotection/ 
 
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may also be
subject to legal privilege. It is intended only for the recipient(s) named
above. If you are not named above as a recipient, you must not read, copy,
disclose, forward or otherwise use the information contained in this email.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender (whose
contact details are above) immediately by reply e-mail and delete the
message and any attachments without retaining any copies.



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 07:35:33 -0700
From: Breen Mullins <bmullins@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-users] Using ethereal by non-root linux user
To: ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <1112884534.5882.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain

On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 14:02 +0200, Johnny Choque wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I am using ethereal in RedHat linux and all is working well using ethereal
> with root user but I need to use ethereal by non-root user for particular
> reasons. Please someone tell me how to configure my linux box for use
> ethereal with non-root user? I already used sudo but it does not work.

Hi Johnny --

You probably need to allow the selected non-root user to use
ethereal by making an entry in the sudoers file.

See 'man sudoers' for more information. 

Breen

-- 
Breen Mullins                      408-435-8401x123       
SQA Engineer                       0xde05499b          
Asante Technologies, Inc.          




------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: linux lover <linux_lover2004@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Ethereal-users] Newbie Dissector question
To: ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <20050407155459.57179.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Hi all,
       I am newbie in ethereal anylyzing code. I read
README.developer and found some info regarding
dissector_add that its prototype must be of form

dissector_add("PARENT_SUBFIELD", ID_VALUE,
PROTOABBREV_handle);

         Then i check packet-ip.c for understanding
that and found alot of that calls
dissector_add("ethertype", ETHERTYPE_IP, ip_handle);
	dissector_add("ppp.protocol", PPP_IP, ip_handle);
	dissector_add("ppp.protocol", ETHERTYPE_IP,
ip_handle);
	dissector_add("gre.proto", ETHERTYPE_IP, ip_handle);
	dissector_add("gre.proto", GRE_WCCP, ip_handle);
	dissector_add("llc.dsap", SAP_IP, ip_handle);
	dissector_add("ip.proto", IP_PROTO_IPIP, ip_handle);
	dissector_add("null.type", BSD_AF_INET, ip_handle);
	dissector_add("chdlctype", ETHERTYPE_IP, ip_handle);
	dissector_add("osinl.excl", NLPID_IP, ip_handle);
	dissector_add("fr.ietf", NLPID_IP, ip_handle);
	dissector_add("x.25.spi", NLPID_IP, ip_handle);
        dissector_add("arcnet.protocol_id",
ARCNET_PROTO_IP_1051, ip_handle);
        dissector_add("arcnet.protocol_id",
ARCNET_PROTO_IP_1201, ip_handle);
        Why does each dissector functions required in
packet-ip.c? Does that mean no. of protocols that can
give packet data handle to IP protocol? If that is the
case then why ICMP handoff has
 dissector_add("ip.proto", IP_PROTO_ICMP,
icmp_handle);
  dissector_add("wtap_encap", WTAP_ENCAP_RAW_ICMP,
icmp_handle);
            First one is ok that ICMP packet processed
IP header and then giving data part to ICMP but what
is other thing wtap_encap?

       Also why proto_reg_handoff_ip has 
        dissector_add_handle("udp.port", ip_handle);
How a parent SUBFIELD be udp?
regards,
linux_lover.


		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Messenger 
Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun. 
http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Ethereal-users mailing list
Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users


End of Ethereal-users Digest, Vol 24, Issue 10
**********************************************