Hi:
I tried to use the Ethereal (ver. 0.10.6) to analyze the captured T.38
traffic. Although the
Ethereal could recognize the T.38 packets, each packet was interpreted as
[Malformed Packet].
Please see the attached file. I don't know whether the T.38 packets were
really incorrectly
formated, or the Ethereal didn't know how to interpret it. Besides, some of
the packets were
interpreted as [UNKNOWN PER: 10.9.3.8.1]. What did it mean?
By the way, I has the following questions about UDPTL header format.
1. According to the T.38 (2002) ASN.1 notation, the item follows the
seq-number of the UDPTL
packet is the primary-ifp-packet. Why the item next to the seq-number
was interpreted as
primary_ifp_packet_length by Ethereal?
2. There are two error recovery methods (FEC & Redundancy) used for T.38
over UDP
transportation. From what item or field could we know which method is
used?
Thanks for your kindly help.
Todd
_________________________________________________________________
Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.com/
Attachment:
t38_analyze
Description: Binary data