Ethereal-users: RE: [Ethereal-users] segmentation fault in 0.10.6 (and 0.10.5)

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: "Oliveras, Michael" <mike.oliveras@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:28:49 -0400
FYI --

I realized that in the trace that I sent, I was using a capture filter on a
single host IP address.  For this scenario, the RTP will be sent to a
different IP address, which is why there is no RTP shown in the capture
file.


Guy,

Thanks for the bug fix.

>From what I know about T38, the call is always setup as a voice call.  When
the terminating device detects the CED tone from the fax machine, it
initiates the switch over to T38 by sending an H245 RequestMode towards the
originator. 



-----Original Message-----
From: Guy Harris [mailto:gharris@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 3:36 AM
To: Ethereal user support
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-users] segmentation fault in 0.10.6 (and 0.10.5)


Oliveras, Michael wrote:

> The attached capture causes ethereal 0.10.6 to seg fault when the capture
is
> decoded.

I've checked in a fix.

> The trace is a t38 fax call through a session controller.

...which explains why, although the code was crashing in the "set up an 
RTP conversation" code, no RTP traffic appeared - the T.38 call was 
going over TCP, but the "set up an RTP conversation' code was assuming UDP.

Is there anything in that capture that indicates that it's setting up a 
T.38 call, rather than an RTP call?  Presumably we shouldn't just be 
assuming that H.245 is setting up an RTP session.

_______________________________________________
Ethereal-users mailing list
Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users