Ethereal-users: RE: [Ethereal-users] Question about MMSE decoding
Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.
From: Santos Edson-WES051 <Edson.Santos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 13:00:08 -0300
Title: Message
Olivier,
I've
configured Ethereal as you mentioned below and is working fine
now.
Thanks
again.
Edson
-----Original Message-----
From: Biot Olivier [mailto:Olivier.Biot@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 10:25 AM
To: 'Ethereal user support'
Subject: RE: [Ethereal-users] Question about MMSE decodingEdson,I attached the output of Ethereal dissection of the MMSE traffic to this mail. Clearly there are two packets identified as MMSE. However, I have TCP reassembly switched on, and also HTTP reassembly (the 2 first check boxes fot the HTTP protocol preference) switched on.Regards,Olivier-----Original Message-----
From: Santos Edson-WES051Oliver,I'm also with version 0.10.4. and the result is different.But if filter is composed with "mmse and tcp" and there is only one MMSE decoded frame, I'm not surprised that only the MMSE frame will be displayed after applying the filter.Do you have any idea of what is happening?Regards,Edson-----Original Message-----
From: Biot OlivierThat's really odd. My version of Ethereal (0.10.4) shows both packets 24 and 26 with the "mmse and tcp" display filter, and shows the 3 desired packets with "(mmse and tcp) or tcp.reassembled_in == 24 or tcp.reassembled_in == 26" as display filter.Regards,Olivier-----Original Message-----
From: Santos Edson-WES051Oliver,Thanks for your prompt answer.I did what you mentioned but did not work. In fact when I applied the 1st display filter I was able to see only frame #26.Regards,EdsonHello Edson,
This is currently not possible "automatically" but you can do it this way:
1. Apply the following display filter:
mmse and tcp
2. Note all packets that match: 24, 26
3. Now create the following display filter:
(mmse and tcp) or tcp.reassembled_in == 24 or tcp.reassembled_in ==
26
4. Prontinho :)
Should you have an MMSE-over-WSP-over-UDP capture, then you replace "tcp"
with "udp" in the previous explanation.
Hope this helps!
Regards,
Olivier
-----Original Message-----
From: Santos Edson-WES051
I'm using Ethereal to decode some MMS messages and I'm able to decode the
MMSE accordingly.
Refer to the file attached, frame #22 is a HTTP Post (sending the MMS
Message) and frame #24 is the MMS message itself. Is there any way to decode
frame #24 as MMSE considering the Content-Type/Content-Legth headers from
frame #22?
Please, could some help me on that?
My Best Regards,
Edson
+55 19 3847-6187
- Prev by Date: [Ethereal-users] Customizing Columns
- Next by Date: [Ethereal-users] Verify DNS MD5 with Ethereal
- Previous by thread: RE: [Ethereal-users] Question about MMSE decoding
- Next by thread: [Ethereal-users] Fink/10.3/Airport Question
- Index(es):