Ethereal-users: Re: [Ethereal-users] TCP Sequence Number Differs From Sniffer Basic

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
From: "Ronnie Sahlberg" <ronnie_sahlberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 18:00:21 +1000
good idea.
i have checked in a change so that it will append "(relative sequence/ack
number)" to these lines when this option is enabled.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Martin Regner"
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 3:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-users] TCP Sequence Number Differs From Sniffer Basic


> Several people I know have been confused when comparing results between
> different tools and similar.
> I think that it might be good to add some information that the sequence
> number is relative when that
> setting is used, e.g. "Sequence number: 140 (relative)" or maybe show both
> the relative value and the non-relative value.