Ethereal-users: RE: [Ethereal-users] Colour filter problem
Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.
From: Biot Olivier <Olivier.Biot@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 09:46:10 +0100
| -----Original Message----- | From: el_lobo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | | Have just downloaded the latest version of Ethereal and installed it | on NT4 workstation. Seems to capture and display data OK, but when I | tried to set up some colour filters it keeps giving me the error: | | 'Filter "name" did not compile correctly. Please try again. Filter | unchanged. Unexpected end of filter string' | and won't store the filter expression. The name of protocols and protocol fields that are used in Ethereal filters may change between two versions. The best way to know a field name is to have a look at the Help -> Supported Protocols menu in Ethereal, and then look up the protocols and fields you want to use in your color filter expression. | I have seen the reference to 'Unexpected end of filter string' within | the FAQ - but it doesn't appear to apply to my problem. As I read your mail, you don't have access to the *NIX man pages which currently are the main documentation of Ethereal. Hence I include the start of the ethereal-filter manpage. Regards, Olivier -------------------- NAME ethereal-filter - Ethereal filter syntax and reference SYNOPSYS ethereal [other options] [ -R "filter expression" ] tethereal [other options] [ -R "filter expression" ] DESCRIPTION Ethereal and Tethereal share a powerful filter engine that help remove the noise from a packet trace and let you see only the packets that interest you. If a packet meets the requirements expressed in your filter, then it is displayed in the list of packets. Display filters let you compare the fields within a protocol against a specific value, compare fields against fields, and to check the existence of specified fields or protocols. Filters are also used by other features such as statistics generation and packet list colorization (the latter is only available to Ethereal). This manual page describes their syntax and provides a comprehensive reference of filter fields. FILTER SYNTAX Check whether a field or protocol exists The simplest filter allows you to check for the existence of a protocol or field. If you want to see all packets which contain the IPX protocol, the filter would be "ipx". (Without the quotation marks) To see all packets that contain a Token-Ring RIF field, use "tr.rif". Think of a protocol or field in a filter as implicitly having the "exists" operator. Note: all protocol and field names that are available in Ethereal and Tethereal filters are listed in the FILTER PROTOCOL REFERENCE (see below). Comparison operators Fields can also be compared against values. The comparison operators can be expressed either through C-like symbols, or through English-like abbreviations: eq, == Equal ne, != Not equal gt, > Greater than lt, < Less Than ge, >= Greater than or Equal to le, <= Less than or Equal to Search and match operators Additional operators exist expressed only in English, not punctuation: contains Does the protocol, byte-string, or text string contain a value matches Does the text string match the given Perl regular expression The "contains" operator allows a filter to search for any sequence of characters that may occur in a protocol or field. The "contains" operator is only implemented for protocols (in which case the sequence of characters is searched for in the data for that protocol), text fields, and raw data fields. For example, to search for a given HTTP URL in a capture, the following filter can be used: http contains "http://www.ethereal.com" The "matches" operator allows a filter to apply to a specified Perl-compatible regular expression (PCRE). The "matches" operator is only implemented for protocols, and also for protocol fields with a text string representation. For example, to search for a given WAP WSP User-Agent, one can write: wsp.user_agent matches "(?i)cldc" This example shows an interesting PCRE feature: pattern match options have to be specified with the (?option) construct. For instance, (?i) performs a case-insensitive pattern match. More information on PCRE can be found in the pcrepattern(3) man page (Perl Regular Expressions are explained in http://www.perldoc.com/perl5.8.0/pod/perlre.html). Note: the "matches" operator is only available if Ethereal or Tethereal have been compiled with the PCRE library. This can be checked by running: ethereal -v tethereal -v or selecting the "About Ethereal" item from the "Help" menu in Ethereal. Protocol field types Furthermore, each protocol field is typed. The types are: Unsigned integer (either 8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit, or 32-bit) Signed integer (either 8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit, or 32-bit) Boolean Ethernet address (6 bytes) Byte string (n-number of bytes) IPv4 address IPv6 address IPX network number Text string Double-precision floating point number An integer may be expressed in decimal, octal, or hexadecimal notation. The following three display filters are equivalent: frame.pkt_len > 10 frame.pkt_len > 012 frame.pkt_len > 0xa Boolean values are either true or false. In a display filter expression testing the value of a Boolean field, "true" is expressed as 1 or any other non-zero value, and "false" is expressed as zero. For example, a token-ring packet's source route field is boolean. To find any source-routed packets, a display filter would be: tr.sr == 1 Non source-routed packets can be found with: tr.sr == 0 Ethernet addresses, as well as a string of bytes, are represented in hex digits. The hex digits may be separated by colons, periods, or hyphens: fddi.dst eq ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff ipx.srcnode == 0.0.0.0.0.1 eth.src == aa-aa-aa-aa-aa-aa If a string of bytes contains only one byte, then it is represented as an unsigned integer. That is, if you are testing for hex value 'ff' in a one-byte byte-string, you must compare it agains '0xff' and not 'ff'. IPv4 addresses can be represented in either dotted decimal notation, or by using the hostname: ip.dst eq www.mit.edu ip.src == 192.168.1.1 IPv4 addresses can be compared with the same logical relations as numbers: eq, ne, gt, ge, lt, and le. The IPv4 address is stored in host order, so you do not have to worry about how the endianness of an IPv4 address when using it in a display filter. Classless InterDomain Routing (CIDR) notation can be used to test if an IPv4 address is in a certain subnet. For example, this display filter will find all packets in the 129.111 Class-B network: ip.addr == 129.111.0.0/16 Remember, the number after the slash represents the number of bits used to represent the network. CIDR notation can also be used with hostnames, in this example of finding IP addresses on the same Class C network as 'sneezy': ip.addr eq sneezy/24 The CIDR notation can only be used on IP addresses or hostnames, not in variable names. So, a display filter like "ip.src/24 == ip.dst/24" is not valid. (yet) IPX networks are represented by unsigned 32-bit integers. Most likely you will be using hexadecimal when testing for IPX network values: ipx.srcnet == 0xc0a82c00 Strings are enclosed in double-quotes: http.request.method == "POST" Inside double quotes, you may use the backslash to embed a double-quote, or an arbitrary byte represented in either octal or hexadecimal. browser.comment == "An embedded \" double-quote" Use of hexadecimal to look for "HEAD": http.request.method == "\x48EAD" Use of octal to look for "HEAD": http.request.method == "\x110EAD" This means that you must escape backslashes with backslashes inside double quotes: smb.path contains "\\\\SERVER\\SHARE" to look for \\SERVER\SHARE in "smb.path". The slice operator A slice operator also exists. You can check the substring (byte-string) of any protocol or field. For example, you can filter on the vendor portion of an ethernet address (the first three bytes) like this: eth.src[0:3] == 00:00:83 If the length of your byte-slice is only one byte, then it is still represented in hex, but without the preceding "0x": llc[3] == aa You can use the slice operator on a protocol name, too. And remember, the "frame" protocol encompasses the entire packet, allowing you to look at the nth byte of a packet regardless of its frame type (Ethernet, token-ring, etc.). token[0:5] ne 0.0.0.1.1 ipx[0:2] == ff:ff llc[3:1] eq 0xaa The following syntax governs slices: [i:j] i = start_offset, j = length [i-j] i = start_offset, j = end_offset, inclusive. [i] i = start_offset, length = 1 [:j] start_offset = 0, length = j [i:] start_offset = i, end_offset = end_of_field Offsets and lengths can be negative, in which case they indicate the offset from the end of the field. Here's how to check the last 4 bytes of a frame: frame[-4:4] == 0.1.2.3 or frame[-4:] == 0.1.2.3 You can create complex concatenations of slices using the comma operator: field[1,3-5,9:] == 01:03:04:05:09:0a:0b Logical expressions All the above tests can be combined together with logical expressions. These too are expressable in C-like syntax or with English-like abbreviations: and, && Logical AND or, || Logical OR not, ! Logical NOT Expressions can be grouped by parentheses as well. The following are all valid display filter expressions: tcp.port == 80 and ip.src == 192.168.2.1 not llc (ipx.srcnet == 0xbad && ipx.srnode == 0.0.0.0.0.1) || ip tr.dst[0:3] == 0.6.29 xor tr.src[0:3] == 0.6.29 Remember that whenever a protocol or field name occurs in an expression, the "exists" operator is implicitly called. The "exists" operator has the highest priority. This means that the first filter expression must be read as "show me the packets for which tcp.port exists and equals 80, and ip.src exists and equals 192.168.2.1". The second filter expression means "show me the packets where not (llc exists)", or in other words "where llc does not exist" and hence will match all packets that do not convey the llc protocol. A special caveat must be given regarding fields that occur more than once per packet. "ip.addr" occurs twice per IP packet, once for the source address, and once for the destination address. Likewise, "tr.rif.ring" fields can occur more than once per packet. The following two expressions are not equivalent: ip.addr ne 192.168.4.1 not ip.addr eq 192.168.4.1 The first filter says "show me IP packets where an ip.addr exists that does not equal 192.168.4.1". That is, as long as one ip.addr in the packet does not equal 192.168.44.1, the packet passes the display filter. The second filter "don't show me any packets that have at least one ip.addr field equal to 192.168.4.1". If one ip.addr is 192.168.4.1, the packet does not pass. If neither ip.addr fields is 192.168.4.1, then the packet passes. It is easy to think of the 'ne' and 'eq' operators as having an implict "exists" modifier when dealing with multiply-recurring fields. "ip.addr ne 192.168.4.1" can be thought of as "there exists an ip.addr that does not equal 192.168.4.1". Be careful with multiply-recurring fields; they can be confusing. Care must also be taken when using the display filter to remove noise from the packet trace. If you want to e.g. filter out all IP multicast packets to address 224.1.2.3, then using: ip.dst ne 224.1.2.3 may be too restrictive. Filtering with "ip.dst" selects only those IP packets that satisfy the rule. Any other packets, including all non-IP packets, will not be displayed. For displaying also the non-IP packets, you can use one of the following two expressions: not ip or ip.dst ne 224.1.2.3 not ip.addr eq 224.1.2.3 The first filter uses "not ip" to include all non-IP packets and then lets "ip.dst ne 224.1.2.3" to filter out the unwanted IP packets. The second filter has already been explained above where filtering with multiply occuring fields was discussed.
- Prev by Date: Re: [Ethereal-users] UDP checksum with less than 16 bytes
- Next by Date: Re: [Ethereal-users] System crash?
- Previous by thread: Re: [Ethereal-users] Colour filter problem
- Next by thread: [Ethereal-users] minimum frame size
- Index(es):