Ethereal-users: Re: [Ethereal-users] IGMP v1 or v2?

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 21:42:00 +0200
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 01:50:53PM -0500, Nicoson Dave wrote:
> With older versions of ethereal (specifically 08.13C) and windump, the
> attached packet is decoded as IGMP V1.  This would seem to be correct, as
> the type field=0x12.

> Is there a reason this should be interpretted as IGMPv2 that I'm missing?

I didn't see one, so I checked in a fix. It looks like the original author
interpolated from the query to the report - the code looked similar, just
the RFCs didn't... The upcoming 0.9.14 should contain the fix.

 Thanks
            Jörg

-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.