Ethereal-users: Re: [Ethereal-users] ethereal

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: Guy Harris <gharris@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:01:42 -0700
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 10:46:57AM +0100, Richard Urwin wrote:
> 1. Redhat has in the past distributed two RPMs for ethereal: "ethereal" and
> "ethereal-GUI". You should probably install both. "ethereal" contains
> tethereal (The command line based ethereal) and "ethereal-GIU" contains
> ethereal.

...although further in the past they called the GUI one "ethereal-gnome"
or something such as that (the fact that Ethereal uses GTK+ but *not*
GNOME nonwithstanding).

> 2. In my experience (with Mandrake 9.x) no Linux install ever creates an
> icon either on the menus or the desktop. One reason for this is that there
> are so many different desktop managers about.

...although Debian has a scheme that lets a package install a menu
regardless of what's providing the menu:

	http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/menu.html/

although the message at

	http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200304/msg00809.html

seems to be saying that KDE doesn't, and can't, use it, and the message
at

	http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200304/msg01131.html

seems to be saying GNOME doesn't use it either, and there's a
freedesktop.org menu scheme being developed:

	http://www.freedesktop.org/standards/menu.html