Ethereal-users: RE: [Ethereal-users] Gigabit capture NIC

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: "Robert Casto" <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:35:36 -0500
Ian,

For 1000BaseT you will probably want a server class NIC. Look at the
Intel or 3COM server class ones, not a desktop model. There are 133 MHz
PCIX models offered that should be able to pull in the packets off a
busy line. I don't have testing data yet but will in a couple of weeks.
I am having a server class box build that will have 2 Gbit NIC's and I
will be trying out a busy network to see what it can handle before
loosing packets.

Remember that it is I/O speed that is important. CPU processing power is
helpful to work the data and get it off the NIC, but if the NIC is not
fast enough, it won't be able to keep up with the data stream.


Robert Casto 
Tel (513) 755-2221 
Cell (513) 349-5282 
robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
http://www.cincijava.com


-----Original Message-----
From: ethereal-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ethereal-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ian Schorr
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 5:10 PM
Cc: ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Ethereal-users] Gigabit capture NIC


Is anyone on this list aware of a PCI-based, 1000BaseSX or 1000BaseT 
Ethernet NIC that supports generating timestamps onboard?

I'm trying to build a PC for high-speed data capture (ideally up to gig 
rates, if I can get it to happen), and trying to ensure accuracy 
timestamps as much as possible.

Ideally, the board should be 64-bit, 66mhz PCI and support x86 Linux 
well, but if anyone can point out an example of ONE I'd be in better 
shape than I am =)

Thanks,
Ian

_______________________________________________
Ethereal-users mailing list
Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users