Ethereal-users: Re: [Ethereal-users] Problems Compiling 0.9.9 on OpenBSD 3.2-stable

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 14:25:40 -0800
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:21:02PM -0600, Eric wrote:
> Sure, the following inline is the config.log

	...

> configure:5020: checking whether the linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries
> configure:5715: result: yes
> configure:5720: checking how to hardcode library paths into programs
> configure:5744: result: immediate
> configure:5749: checking whether stripping libraries is possible
> configure:5757: result: no
> configure:5765: checking dynamic linker characteristics
> configure:6172: result: openbsd3.2 ld.so
> configure:6177: checking if libtool supports shared libraries
> configure:6179: result: yes

OK, I guess it got that right:

> configure:6182: checking whether to build shared libraries
> configure:6203: result: yes
> configure:6206: checking whether to build static libraries
> configure:6210: result: yes

So far, so good, although we don't actually build any shared libraries
on UNIX at this point, just dynamically-loadable modules.


> configure:10214: checking whether GLib supports loadable modules
> configure:10243: gcc -o conftest -D_U_="__attribute__((unused))" -Wall -W -g -O2 -I$(top_srcdir) -I$(top_srcdir)/wiretap -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/local/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include/glib-1.2  -I$(top_srcdir) -I$(top_srcdir)/wiretap -I/usr/local/include  -L/usr/local/lib conftest.c -L/usr/local/lib -lgmodule -lglib  >&5
> configure:10246: $? = 0
> configure:10248: ./conftest
> configure:10251: $? = 0
> configure:10266: result: yes

Good, and it got that right, too.

So I'm not sure what the heck is going on there.

> > Also, does a message like
> > 
> > 	libtool: link: warning: `AC_LIBTOOL_DLOPEN' not used.  Assuming
> > 	    no dlopen support.
> > 
> > appear anywhere in the output of the make?  (It appears in the output of
> > a build here on Solaris 2.8/SPARC, with automake 1.5, autoconf 2.57, and
> > libtool 1.3.4.; 
> 
> Nope, there were no such references in the file.

Could you send (in an attachment) the full output of the make?