Ethereal-users: Re: [Ethereal-users] Supported PT code for RTP Packets

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: "Martin Regner" <martin.regner@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 20:23:31 +0100
 * RTP Payload types
 * Table B.2 / H.225.0
 * Also RFC 1890
 */
#define PT_PCMU  0
#define PT_1016  1
#define PT_G721  2
#define PT_GSM  3
#define PT_G723  4
#define PT_DVI4_8000 5
#define PT_DVI4_16000 6
#define PT_LPC  7
#define PT_PCMA  8
#define PT_G722  9
#define PT_L16_STEREO 10
#define PT_L16_MONO 11
#define PT_MPA  14
#define PT_G728  15
#define PT_G729  18
#define PT_CELB  25
#define PT_JPEG  26
#define PT_NV  28
#define PT_H261  31
#define PT_MPV  32
#define PT_MP2T  33
#define PT_H263  34

static const value_string rtp_payload_type_vals[] =
{
 { PT_PCMU, "ITU-T G.711 PCMU" },
 { PT_1016, "USA Federal Standard FS-1016" },
 { PT_G721, "ITU-T G.721" },
 { PT_GSM, "GSM 06.10" },
 { PT_G723, "ITU-T G.723" },
 { PT_DVI4_8000, "DVI4 8000 samples/s" },
 { PT_DVI4_16000, "DVI4 16000 samples/s" },
 { PT_LPC, "LPC" },
 { PT_PCMA, "ITU-T G.711 PCMA" },
 { PT_G722, "ITU-T G.722" },
 { PT_L16_STEREO, "16-bit uncompressed audio, stereo" },
 { PT_L16_MONO, "16-bit uncompressed audio, monaural" },
 { PT_MPA, "MPEG-I/II Audeo"},
 { PT_G728, "ITU-T G.728" },
 { PT_G729, "ITU-T G.729" },
 { PT_CELB, "Sun CELL-B" },
 { PT_JPEG, "JPEG" },
 { PT_NV, "'nv' program" },
 { PT_H261, "ITU-T H.261" },
 { PT_MPV, "MPEG-I/II Video"},
 { PT_MP2T, "MPEG-II transport streams"},
 { PT_H263, "ITU-T H.263" },
 { 0,  NULL },
};



Bates, Curtis wrote:

>Thanks for the answer, but I am looking for something related more to the
>codecs.    Here is a small list I found:
>
>PT   Codec
>0    PCMU    
>2    G726-32 
>3    GSM     
>4    G723    
>5    DVI4    
>6    DVI4    
>7    LPC     
>8    PCMA    
>9    G722    
>10   L16     
>11   L16     
>12   QCELP   
>14   MPA     
>15   G728    
>16   DVI4    
>17   DVI4    
>18   G729    
>
>But I am seeing other codes and don't know what they match to.  Does anyone
>have a more complete list?
>