["ANTONIO GUTIERREZ" <ANTONIO.GUTIERREZ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

is it possiable to have a ICMP Packet have tow Source IP in the same Packet? this is Destination Unreachable.

 

Antonio Gutierrez
Gutierra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
System Support specialist.
13000 Wm. Dodson Plwiy
Farmers Branch, TX 75234
972-9192565

>>> ethereal-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx 01/15/03 12:01PM >>>
Send Ethereal-users mailing list submissions to
    ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    ethereal-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
    ethereal-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Ethereal-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Statistics of data (Ilkka Huotari)
   2. 2 Win2k Systems (bjost)
   3. Interface list empty (Miklos Szigetvari)
   4. Interbase (alex.port@xxxxxxxxxxxx)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: "Ilkka Huotari" <gonzoile@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-users] Statistics of data
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 02:48:14 +0200

> editcap BigCapFile SmallCapFile1 1-20000
> editcap BigCapFile SmallCapFile2 20001-40000
> editcap BigCapFile SmallCapFile3 40001-60000


Ok, thanks. I did that, and for a temprary solution, this is ok. However I
need to gather all the 'evidence' into a one big graph / print the graphs,
so I need to find another solution too.

One other thing however:
When I ask Ethereal to make IO-Stats for me, for the file where I have 50000
frames, the IO-Stat will show packets 1-5000 on the x-axis. Or at least so
it writes out the ticks for x-axis, 1-5000 and not 1-50000. I'm not sure if
the graph is correct or not.


Ilkka

--__--__--

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:00:51 +0100
From: bjost <bjost@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: FH Koblenz
To: ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Ethereal-users] 2 Win2k Systems

Benedikt Jost
Univerisity of Applied Science Koblenz, Germany

Hi!

Is it possible to run Ethereal on a system with two Win2k partitions?

It seems that it is not possible to run E. on the second partition. We
have a working version of E. on the first partition. If we boot the
first p., everything works.
We tried several versions of E. with several versions of WinCap on the
second p. but none of these combinations works( when started on the
second p.)
The versions on the second p. are working; we tested that by starting
them with the first system (boot: first p.)

The error in detail: Few seconds after starting the .exe the programm
stops and an error message occur: error in etheral.exe

It seems that there is a problem with two win2k systems. We tried to
"cheat" and switched of the first harddisk with the first win2k system,
but it doesn't work.

Something in the programm might need "C:\" as the active partition,
which is not possible when booting the second p..
Perhaps there are some start options to change these properties?

I'm looking forward to hear from you!

Greetings, Benedikt Jost

PS: Please send a copy of your answer to : benedikt.jost@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks!


--__--__--

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:26:17 +0100
From: Miklos Szigetvari <miklos.szigetvari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: ISIS Information Systems GmbH
To: ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Ethereal-users] Interface list empty

Hi

If someone can advice :
Just installed ethreal under NT and the capture interface list is empty.

(at home with Windows 2000 evrything works fine )

--
Miklos Szigetvari

Development Team
ISIS Information Systems GmbH
Tel: (+43) 2236 27551 -131     Fax: (+43) 2236 21081

---------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail is only intended for the recipient and not legally
binding. Unauthorised use, publication, reproduction or
disclosure of the content of this e-mail is not permitted.
---------------------------------------------------------------



--__--__--

Message: 4
To: ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
From: alex.port@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:33:19 +0000
Subject: [Ethereal-users] Interbase

I am seeing packets listed as protocol  IB or Interbase however these are
no IB packets in my capture.

Is any one able to detail what ethereal matches packets to to list this as
a IB protocol, ie. is it an offset match for a certain hex value etc , and
if so whats the match?

Could it be 02 51 fa 22 ?

Thanks

Alex Port


This communication is for informational purposes only.  It is not intended as
an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument
or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data
and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and
are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein
do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., its
subsidiaries and affiliates.



--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Ethereal-users mailing list
Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users


End of Ethereal-users Digest