["Ronnie Sahlberg" <ronnie_sahlberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

From: "Guy Harris"
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-users] Three big problems


> On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:02:36AM +1100, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
> > There are reasons why it may not be a really good idea to capture for
> > several days at a time.
> > Even at reasonably slow rates such as 75Mbit/s every packet will still
add
> > to the state buildup inside ethereal until you reach a point where
> > memory is exhausted.
>
> Only if you're reading a capture.  While Ethereal is doing a capture, it
> won't do that, as it's just reading the raw data of a packet, doing a
> *VERY* minimal dissection of the first part of the packet so that it can
> update the appropriate packet count, and writing the raw data to a
> capture file (unless it's an "Update list of packets in real time"
> capture - but, in that case, it's reading the capture).

But that only applies if you do not use any capture filters, right?
If you use capture filters (display filter form) in order to minimize the
amount
of captured data, [t]ethereal will do a complete dissection of every packet
and thus state information will
build up?