Ethereal-users: [Ethereal-users] Re: Ämne: RE: [Ethereal-users] (no subject)

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:37:31 -0700
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 09:22:42PM +0200, Martin Regner wrote:
> If the portnumber in Preferences/Protocols/iSCSI/Target port is set to
> some other value than 0 it is just that port number that is decoded as
> iSCSI it seems.

If it's set to some value other than 0, then the 0x20 bit is checked in
the opcode:

	if that bit is set, the packet isn't decoded as iSCSI if the
	source port doesn't have that value;

	if that bit isn't set, the packet isn't decoded as iSCSI if the
	destination port doesn't have that value.

That may have the effect of causing only that port number to be
decoded as iSCSI.

I will leave it up to Mark Burton, the author of the dissector, to make
any changes to the way iSCSI traffic to ports other than the one in the
preferences setting.