["Solis, Clement" <Clement.Solis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Title: RE: Trying to understand why Ethereal has problems under XP

I had two versions one installed in \windows\system32 the other was a special version in a temp directory I set up as requested to help resolve the problem.  I have renamed the special version and everything continues to work so, I don't know why it has started working, but it has.

Regards,

Clement

-----Original Message-----
From: Gianluca Varenni [mailto:varenni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 19 February 2002 12:55
To: Jens Hektor; Solis, Clement
Cc: ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Loris Degioanni; guy@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Trying to understand why Ethereal has problems under XP

Can you tell me the exact date/time/dimension of packet.dll you are using?

Just a final consideration: only ONE packet.dll must be present in your
system, and MUST be located in \windows\system32\.

So, once you have understood which is the one working, move that to
windows\system32 and delete ALL the others.

GV

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jens Hektor" <hektor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Solis, Clement" <Clement.Solis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "'Gianluca Varenni'" <varenni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Loris Degioanni"
<loris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <guy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: Trying to understand why Ethereal has problems under XP

> Hi,
>
> stop. I got it working too.
>
> Solis, Clement wrote:
> > I have tried running tethereal -D.   although I select to install
> > tethereal I can fin no reference to it in the installed programs.
> > Funny!  I then went back into ethereal to see if I could access
> > tethereal from somewhere in there, and the adapters are now present.  I
> > have not reinstalled ethereal or done anything to change the config of
> > my machine.   I don't understand but it does now seem to be working OK.
>
> Funny.
>
> Having had a closer look on my machine and also on the "versioning
problem"
> I see the following:
>
> a) packet.dll is found in \WIndowsSystem32, the Ethereal Directory
>     & the windump Directory. The one in the windump dir is smaller.
> b) packet.vxd is found in \Windows\System32 & the Ethereal Directory
>
>
> Remembering that Loris once sent me a special version of packet.dll
> and copying it to the etheral directory solved the problem.
> The version that Loris sent me was only 32kB instead of 36kb
> as the others.
>
> Good god, I would prefer dll-names like those for the
> shared objects in unix, containing version numbers.
>
> Sorry for all the trouble I made and thank you all very much for
> the time you spent in helping me.
>
> Bye, Jens
>
> --
> Jens Hektor, RWTH Aachen, Rechenzentrum, Seffenter Weg 23, 52074 Aachen
> Computing Center Technical University Aachen, network operation & security
> mailto:hektor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Tel.: +49 241 80 29206, Raum: 2.35
>
>

---

This message has been 'sanitized'. This means that potentially dangerous content has been rewritten or removed. The following log describes which actions were taken.

Sanitizer (start="1014124462"):
  Part (pos="1588"):
    SanitizeFile (filename="unnamed.txt", mimetype="text/plain"):
      Match (rule="2"):
        Enforced policy: accept

  Part (pos="5330"):
    SanitizeFile (filename="unnamed.html", mimetype="text/html"):
      Match (rule="default"):
        Enforced policy: accept

    Rewrote HTML tag: >>_META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"_<<
                  as: >>_MANGLED_ON_PURPOSE_META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"_<<
    Rewrote HTML tag: >>_META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2653.12"_<<
                  as: >>_MANGLED_ON_PURPOSE_META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2653.12"_<<
    Total modifications so far: 2

Anomy 0.0.0 : Sanitizer.pm $Id: Sanitizer.pm,v 1.32 2001/10/11 19:27:15 bre Exp $

This e-mail is confidential and is intended solely for use by the individual to whom it is addressed. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Reliance Security Services Limited immediately by returning this e-mail to sender or calling +44 (0) 1895 205000 and be advised that you have received this mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of it is strictly prohibited.

Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. Although Reliance Security operates an active anti-virus policy, the company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail, including any attachments.