I didn't set a schedule for each of the milestones on
http://wiki.ethereal.com/Development/Roadmap since I wasn't sure when
each pending item would be completed. Should we set a hard date for the
1.0 release? (This upcoming July 14 will be Ethereal's 8th anniversary.)
Gilbert Ramirez wrote:
> Sorry that I haven't paid close attention to this, but what's the
> time-frame for getting new features into the beta? I'm working on
> adding functions to the display filter language... to support lower()
> and upper() in string comparisons, but it's still going to be a while.
>
> I'm fine with whatever schedule there is, but by knowing the time
> frame I should be able to figure out if I target a release into the
> beta branch, or just wait for some other future window after the 1.0
> release.
>
> thanks,
>
> --gilbert
>
> On 4/18/06, Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> W. Borgert wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> will the fixes of the last 4 days be integrated into the
>>> upcoming 1.0 release? None, all, some? E.g. I would like to see
>>> the GIOP fixes in 1.0. Thanks in advance.
>> I have the following revisions slated to be copied from /trunk to
>> /trunk-1.0:
>>
>> 17860: Null pointer exception in win32-file-dlg.c
>> 17861: Skip non-data records in the Network Instruments code (bug 767)
>> 17865: Fractional timestamp fix (bug 865)
>> 17874: hcidump file fix
>>
>> Which GIOP revisions should be copied? Is there anything else that
>> should go into 0.99.0?
>>
>> I'll work on them this afternoon if I can stay out of meetings long enough.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ethereal-dev mailing list
>> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev