["Peter Lei (peterlei)" <peterlei@xxxxxxxxx>]

Please see the Implementer's Guide I-D for clarifications
(draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpimpguide-16); note this text is going
into the 2960bis. :-)

"Tag reflected" and "Tag not reflected" are more implementation
neutral as not all implementations use a "TCB", and "TCB" has
been removed from the text.  The T-bit indicates whether the
V-Tag is reflected, or not.

Thus, I think the current dissector should be left as is.

regards,
--peter

Jeff Morriss wrote:
> 
> Hi list,
> 
> Ethereal's description of the T-bit in SCTP (on Shutdown Complete's and
> ABORTs) has always confused me.  The attached patch updates the wording
> to be closer to what's in the RFC:
> 
>>    T bit:  1 bit
>>
>>       The T bit is set to 0 if the sender had a TCB that it destroyed.
>>       If the sender did not have a TCB it should set this bit to 1.
> 
> Please consider for inclusion.
> 
> Regards,
> -Jeff
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature