["Lars Roland" <Lars.Roland@xxxxxxx>]

Am 10.03.2006, 17:00 Uhr, schrieb Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping@xxxxxx>:

> > Use this updated patch instead.
>
> You make things worse than they are.
>
> Don't manipulate data coming from a packet! If the block_length in the  
> packet is invalid, use it anyway.
>
> Stopping the dissection of a packet because there are not enough data is  
> a bad idea. Showing Malformed Packet is the way to go here.

You are right. If a dissector requests more bytes than the packet  
contains, the packet has to be shown as malformed.
But the question here is, how much data the dissector should request. We  
have a length field for the pdu, and a length field for each value.
Should we stop dissection, if a value exceeds the boundaries of the pdu?  
What shall we do, if enough bytes are available beyond the pdu boundary?
I agree that we should show it as a "Malformed Packet" in this situation  
anyway. But you won't catch wrong pdu lengths by just using the  
block_length. This way you would catch only wrong lengths for values.

Regards,
Lars