Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of Ethereal

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
From: Guy Harris <gharris@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 11:59:06 -0800
Andreas Sikkema wrote:

BTW, we have a lower defect rate than most of the projects on the list
including Apache, Firefox, FreeBSD, gcc, Gnome, Linux 2.6, OpenSSL,
Perl, and Python.  Of the projects > 1M lines of code, we have the
lowest defect rate by far.  Heh.


As mentioned on lwn.net http://lwn.net/Articles/174426/:
"On the other hand, ethereal shows a very low defect rate, which can be hard to square with the long list of security advisories from that 
project."
If we stopped issuing security advisories, we could make it easier to understand those results. :-)
I.e., as Gerald noted, that might be a disadvantage of being somewhat vigorous about finding problems with, for example, the fuzz testing.