Which version of gnutls should be used (1.2.10 or 1.3.4)?
Anders Broman wrote:
> Hi,
> Should we get gnutls, libcrypt and lua for Windows included as well?
>
> Brg
> Anders
>
> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Fr�n: ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] F�r Gerald Combs
> Skickat: den 28 februari 2006 17:18
> Till: Ethereal development
> �mne: [Ethereal-dev] Preparing for 1.0
>
> Enough major changes have been introduced since the last release to
> warrant bumping the minor revision. I figure we may as well bump it to
> 0.99.0 in order to prepare for an impending 1.0 release.
>
> Along with the items in http://wiki.ethereal.com/Development/Roadmap I'd
> like to do the following before 1.0:
>
> - Finalize dumpcap - Ulf, I'm not sure how much work is left, but is
> dumpcap in good enough shape for a security audit? If so, we could
> make it set{u|g}id on platforms that need it.
>
> - Smooth out the Windows file dialogs: The "Filter" button doesn't
> work, for instance.
>
> - Improve our packages:
> - Polish the RPM spec file. (The last time I tried to build the
> SRPM under SUSE, it failed.)
> - Move the Solaris package to GLib/GTK+ 2.x.
> - Add a Mac package.
>
> - Fix the annoying display-filter-stalls-due-to-hostname-lookup bug.
>
> - Add version checking to the Help menu, similar to Firefox and other
> apps?
>
> - Designate a set of dissectors as "known safe"?
>
> Comments?
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev