Hi,
testing with an older version of the STANAG 5066 stack turned up a small
bug in the display of two packets types.
Patch is attached
Thanks,
--
Menno Andriesse
Nato C3 Agency
CIS Division,
Transmission & Network Services
Resource Centre
P.O. Box 174
2501 CD The Hague
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 (0)70 374 3449
Fax: +31 (0)70 374 3049
mailto:Menno.Andriesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Index: epan/dissectors/packet-s5066.c
===================================================================
--- epan/dissectors/packet-s5066.c (revision 16507)
+++ epan/dissectors/packet-s5066.c (working copy)
@@ -641,7 +641,7 @@
{ "Number of errored blocks", "s5066.21.err_blocks", FT_UINT16, BASE_DEC, NULL, 0x0, "", HFILL }
},
{ &hf_s5066_21_nrx_blocks,
- { "Number of non-received blocks", "s5066.21.nrx_blocks", FT_UINT16, BASE_DEC, NULL, 0x0F, "", HFILL }
+ { "Number of non-received blocks", "s5066.21.nrx_blocks", FT_UINT16, BASE_DEC, NULL, 0x0, "", HFILL }
},
/* Type 22: S_UNIDATA_REQUEST_CONFIRM */
{ &hf_s5066_22_unused,
@@ -702,7 +702,7 @@
{ "Number of errored blocks", "s5066.25.err_blocks", FT_UINT16, BASE_DEC, NULL, 0x0, "", HFILL }
},
{ &hf_s5066_25_nrx_blocks,
- { "Number of non-received blocks", "s5066.25.nrx_blocks", FT_UINT16, BASE_DEC, NULL, 0x0F, "", HFILL }
+ { "Number of non-received blocks", "s5066.25.nrx_blocks", FT_UINT16, BASE_DEC, NULL, 0x0, "", HFILL }
},
/* Type 26: S_EXPEDITED_UNIDATA_REQUEST_CONFIRM */
{ &hf_s5066_26_unused,