[Thomas Anders <thomas.anders@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> So, what we need is
> either
> 1, someone writes the required functions by hand to implement what we
> need based on what is available in nettle or just reimplements it by
> hand completely.
> 2, someone gets some people to develop GPLssl

We've said this too many times, I think, without making progress yet.

Now that Paolo's patch is there, the main question is whether he gets permission 
from the ssldump author(s) to license this ssldump-derived code under GPL. Then

1) If yes, check the patch in. If it can be improved later to not depend on 
OpenSSL anymore: even better.

2) If not, we must *not* check the patch in. Anyone's still free to integrate it 
in his own private tree, though.


+Thomas

--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)