Ethereal-dev: [Ethereal-dev] Re: Bug report for ethereal-0.10.10 on Fedora x86_64 version (con
Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.
From: Radek Vokal <rvokal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:56:24 +0200
Well, I don't agree that this is a widget problem. My debugging came to this patch, which is really nasty way how to get it work. I really wonder why is if_name set to NULL+1?! With the below patch ethereal seems to work fine (tested with ethereal -i any -kS on x86_64 machine) Radek --- ethereal-0.10.10/capture_ui_utils.c.broken 2005-03-23 06:54:55.000000000 +0100 +++ ethereal-0.10.10/capture_ui_utils.c 2005-03-29 10:36:14.000000000 +0200 @@ -126,7 +126,8 @@ if_entry = if_list; do { if_info = if_entry->data; - if (strcmp(if_info->name, if_name) == 0) { + + if (if_name != (NULL+1) && strcmp(if_info->name, if_name) == 0) { if (if_info->description != NULL) { /* Return a copy of that - when we free the interface list, that'll also free up the strings to which @@ -139,7 +140,7 @@ } free_interface_list(if_list); - if (descr == NULL) { + if (descr == NULL && if_name != (NULL+1)) { /* The interface name is all we have, so just return a copy of that. */ descr = g_strdup(if_name); } On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 22:26 +0100, Pierre JUHEN wrote: > I am really stucked on this bug. > > > Facts : > > Ethereal 0.10.9 recompiled in the same environment in x86_64 mode is OK > (bug doesn't show up) > > Ethereal 0.10.10 RPMs for i386 (Fedora Core 3) mode are OK (bug doesn't > show up) > > => bug is specific to the x86_64 version of 0.10.10 release. > > Bug does occur only when doing synchronous capture. > > Bug occurs wether autoscrolling is set or not. > > > > Memory corruption seems to occur on this line : > > menu.c : 863 if ((menu_item = > gtk_item_factory_get_widget(ifactory, dup)) != NULL) { > > of > > set_menu_sensitivity (ifactory=0xb88d30, path=0xb5a8a3 "", val=1) at > menu.c:863 > > ifactory seems to be OK. > > dup = "/Statistics/Service Response Time/Fibre Channel..." > > before the execution of the line backtrace shows : > > #0 set_menu_sensitivity (ifactory=0xb88d30, path=0xb5a8a3 "", val=1) at > menu.c:863 > #1 0x000000000043e08b in walk_menu_tree_for_selected_packet > (node=0xe92874, fd=0x0, edt=0x0) at menu.c:1690 > #2 0x000000000043e0a0 in walk_menu_tree_for_selected_packet > (node=0xe92874, fd=0x0, edt=0x0) at menu.c:1679 > #3 0x000000000043e41b in set_menus_for_selected_packet > (cf=0x5fb100) at menu.c:1744 > #4 0x00000000004294f8 in cf_unselect_packet (cf=0x5fb100) at > file.c:2963 > #5 0x0000000000429cf1 in cf_reset_state (cf=0x5fb100) at file.c:286 > #6 0x000000000042a59e in cf_open (cf=0x5fb100, fname=0xe44180 > "/tmp/etherXXXXhBeFLC", is_tempfile=1, err=0x7fbfffd9c8) at file.c:194 > #7 0x000000000042a746 in cf_start_tail (cf=0x5fb100, fname=0xb5a8a4 "", > is_tempfile=15280242, err=0x0) at file.c:503 > #8 0x0000000000424332 in sync_pipe_do_capture > (capture_opts=0x60b2e0, is_tempfile=1) at capture_sync.c:496 > #9 0x00000000004232f5 in do_capture (capture_opts=0x60b2e0) at > capture.c:176 > > after the execution of the line, backtrace shows : > > #0 set_menu_sensitivity (ifactory=0xb88d30, path=0xbddcd0 "\200S", > val=1) at menu.c:864 > #1 0x000000000043e08b in walk_menu_tree_for_selected_packet > (node=0xbddce0, fd=0x0, edt=0x0) at menu.c:1690 > #2 0x000000000043e0a0 in walk_menu_tree_for_selected_packet > (node=0xbddce0, fd=0x0, edt=0x0) at menu.c:1679 > #3 0x000000000043e41b in set_menus_for_selected_packet > (cf=0x5fb100) at menu.c:1744 > #4 0x00000000004294f8 in cf_unselect_packet (cf=0x5fb100) at > file.c:2963 > #5 0x0000000000429cf1 in cf_reset_state (cf=0x5fb100) at file.c:286 > #6 0x000000000042a59e in cf_open (cf=0x5fb100, fname=0xe44180 > "/tmp/etherXXXXhBeFLC", is_tempfile=1, err=0x7fbfffd9c8) at file.c:194 > #7 0x000000000042a746 in cf_start_tail (cf=0x5fb100, fname=0x190 > <Address 0x190 out of bounds>, is_tempfile=-536870874, err=0x50) at > file.c:503 > #8 0x0000000000424332 in sync_pipe_do_capture > (capture_opts=0x60b2e0, is_tempfile=1) at capture_sync.c:496 > #9 0x00000000004232f5 in do_capture (capture_opts=0x60b2e0) at > capture.c:176 > > (unmodified lines are indented) > > > > Now I need hints to go further.... > > Thanks, > > Pierre JUHEN > > > > -- Radek Vokál <rvokal@xxxxxxxxxx> OS Systems Engineer IT executives rate Red Hat #1 for value http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/index.html
- References:
- Prev by Date: [Ethereal-dev] Re: IA5String
- Next by Date: [Ethereal-dev] Re: Improving filter speed
- Previous by thread: [Ethereal-dev] Re: Bug report for ethereal-0.10.10 on Fedora x86_64 version (continuation)
- Next by thread: [Ethereal-dev] Regarding Display Filters
- Index(es):