Hi,
Overlap is a concern I've had, too. But I'm not sure what to do/can be
done about it.
For ITU based things could the Application Context be a better "router"
than the SSN? (But that's not present on all messages-->implies the
need for conversations?) Heuristics would probably be difficult, too.
Regards,
-Jeff
Anders Broman (AL/EAB) wrote:
Hi,
I don't opose the patch as sutch, just wondering what's the *right* thing to do. If many differnt ssn "users"
occure in the same trace there might be problems with overlap as well I suppose.
Eventhough I made some work on the gsm-map dissector I'm not looking at gsm-map traces myself. So you
guys decide. If no one objects I'll check in your patch tonight(time permitting).
Best regards
Anders
-----Original Message-----
From: ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jeff Morriss
Sent: den 17 mars 2005 16:24
To: Ethereal development
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-dev] GSM MAP: register for range of SSNs
Hi,
I put that preference there as I received a trace where the ssn was outside of the range predefined in the
previous dissector, my reasoning for making it individual ones rather than a range was that I though
the ssn:s used could be "any" rather than a range, I haven't found any documentation giving certain applications
fixed ssn numbers. Is there sutch a document or any convention used?
( GSM-MAP, INAP, CCBS ....)
or is it totally up to the administration?
Hmmm, I don't know.
However, I do tend to get questions like: "Why isn't Ethereal decoding
my GSM MAP message as GSM MAP? I thought it understood GSM MAP." I
look and find they're using (in their testing) some unusual SSN (either
because that SSN is their favorite number or because they got forced off
the "usual" SSNs because someone else is testing on those).
Perhaps only two ssn number are realy needed for any particular trace?
Probably yes.
I suppose all dissectors based on ssn should be made the same in this respect?
I would think so (I was thinking of looking at doing that if this patch
were accepted).
(Another reason for the patch is simply that I tend to prefer the
look-n-feel of one preference with a range to N uint preferences...)
Regards,
-Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jeff Morriss
Sent: den 17 mars 2005 01:12
To: Ethereal Development List
Subject: [Ethereal-dev] GSM MAP: register for range of SSNs
I saw today that the GSM MAP dissector now has a preference for up to 5
TCAP SSNs. Rather than do that I think it would be better if it used
the new range preference type.
The attached patch does that and (sorry, I know it makes the patch
harder to read) cleaned up some indenting around the code I was changing
(which results in the actual code being easier to read).
I didn't register the old prefs as obsolete since README.developer
doesn't suggest doing that any more; should it (both my patch and the
README)?
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-dev mailing list
Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-dev mailing list
Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev