Again, my intention is not just to remotize the capture process, it is
to create intelligent probes.
Probes that might be able even to filter transactions (for example using MATE).
I think in telephony (my field) where I could put few different probes
arround the network and be able to trace a sigle call's signalling
without transporting more frames than necessary.
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:46:16 +0100, Gianluca Varenni <varenni@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> What about the remote capture features of WinPcap? WinPcap is able to
> capture from remote machines, and the code for the remote capture runs on
> windows and Linux (I'm not sure about BSD).
>
> More details can be found here
>
> http://winpcap.polito.it/docs/man/html/group__remote__help.html
>
> Have a nice day
> GV
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John McDermott" <jjm@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "LEGO" <luis.ontanon@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <jjm@xxxxxxxxxx>; "Ethereal development" <ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 5:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ethereal-dev] ERTSP: Ethereal's RemoTe Sniffing Protocol
>
> >
> >>> > The Idea is a protocol to have sniffing clients and a sniffing servers
> >>> > communicate. Part like RTSP, and part like RTP+RTCP with
> >>> > retransmissions.
> >>> This sounds really cool and well thought out. Maybe I'm missing
> >>> something, though. What about RMON? Yes, it has another filtering
> >>> language and yes, it is not "real time" in the sense that Ethereal is,
> >>> but
> >>> mightn't it be an appropriate solution? Then, Ethereal could
> >>> inter-operate with existing probes and so forth.
> >>
> >> The point is to be able to use display filters on the remote probe
> >> before packets are transmitted.
> >
> > Well, RMON does that, but it uses its own filtering language, and if we
> > want true Ethereal display filters, then, of course RMON is out (unless we
> > were to create a private filter MIB, I suppose...). I just thought
> > interoperability might be useful. I'm not convinced RMON is better than
> > your proposal, BTW, I just wanted to offer the thought.
> >
> > We discussed this in 1999/2000 so you might want to check the archives for
> > that discussion, too.
> >
> > --john
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ethereal-dev mailing list
> > Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>