[Guy Harris <gharris@xxxxxxxxx>]

Francisco Alcoba (TS/EEM) wrote:

> get_addr_name, in addr_resolv.c, returns a name corresponding to an address if the address 
> supports name resolution, and NULL if not. I've seen it is used only in column-utils, 
> conversations_table and hostlist_table. In all three of them, if it returns NULL, the code calls 
> address_to_str or address_to_str_buf immediately afterwards. These two return the address 
> conversion if they have received a valid address type, or g_assert if they received an AT_NONE.

In the case of "address_to_str_buf()", the address conversion is copied 
into the buffer supplied as an argument.

> I think it would be better if get_addr_name would:
>
>  - resolve to a name if the address supports it
>  - call address_to_str if it does not, but the address is valid
>  - return "NONE" if it is AT_NONE

I'd vote for:

	an internal routine that does what "get_addr_name()" does now;

	"get_addr_name()", which would work as you describe, calling that 
internal routine and, if that fails, calling "address_to_str()";

	"get_addr_name_buf()", which would take a buffer pointer *and* a buffer 
size, and would call the internal routine and

		if that succeeds, "strncpy()" to the specified buffer using the 
specified size;

		if that fails, call "address_to_str_buf()";

to avoid an extra string copy.