Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Naming conflict: capinfo

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: "Jim Young" <SYSJHY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 07:33:04 -0400
>>> gharris@xxxxxxxxx 2004-10-20 04:57:02 >>>
> I'd vote for renaming capinfo to avoid a collision.  If we 
> can't come up with a better name than capfileinfo - which 
> I don't really think is a great name, but I'm not sure what 
> would be a better name - let's use that.

How about: "capstat" or "capstats"? 

If the name has to change, these two names came to mind 
after reviewing the current Ethereal capinfo man page
doc at:

  http://www.ethereal.com/docs/man-pages/capinfo.1.html 

Of course a quick google search will show that both the
capstat and capstats names have a meaning and use 
elsewhere!

Now what was funny to me was that a google on "capinfo" 
got me to the tcprelay's capinfo link, the tool that prompted
this rename discussion:

  http://tcpreplay.sourceforge.net/capinfo.html 

Is it just me or do these tools have similar functionality?  
I haven't looked at the tcprelay's capinfo source nor
the reports it generates (yet) but it smells like they
both may have diverged from common source?  
Even the first line under the man page description's for 
both capinfo's look remarkably similar to me.

Would a (long term) better course of action be for both
packages, ethereal and tcprelay to use the same 
capinfo tool?

Just some thoughts.

Best regards,

Jim Young