Ethereal-dev: RE: [Ethereal-dev] RTP Graph analysis

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: "Alejandro Vaquero" <alejandrovaquero@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 18:09:04 -0600
Hi,	I'll try to learn how the wiki page work and post some
information there included nice screenshots :-)

Regards
Alejandro
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ethereal-dev-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ronnie sahlberg
> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 6:24 AM
> To: Ethereal development
> Subject: Re: [Ethereal-dev] RTP Graph analysis
> 
> Alejandro,   maybe you can add some content for RTP analysis and
> statistics with some nice screenshots to the wiki page?
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 15:37:28 -0600, Alejandro Vaquero  wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >        Both gcc warnings fixed.
> >
> > Regards
> > Alejandro
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Guy Harris
> > Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 1:21 AM
> > To: Ethereal development
> > Subject: Re: [Ethereal-dev] RTP Graph analysis
> >
> > Alejandro Vaquero wrote:
> >
> > >       Attached is a new version with the warnings fixed.
> >
> > Checked in.
> >
> > Still some warnings from GCC:
> >
> > rtp_analysis.c: In function `get_clock_rate':
> > rtp_analysis.c:231: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
> > rtp_analysis.c: In function `rtp_packet_add_graph':
> > rtp_analysis.c:441: warning: unused parameter `rtpinfo'
> >
> > The first of those antedates your changes - the problem is that the
key
> > in a key_value structure is unsigned (guint32), but -1 is used as
the
> > end-of-table indicator - and the comparison between the key and -1
gets
> > a warning.  (It also returns -1 as a "clock rate not found" value -
but
> > no callers check for that; they should do so.)
> >
> > The second warning is new - is there anything in
> > "rtp_packet_add_graph()" that could, or should, use something in the
> > structure pointed to by "rtpinfo"?  If not, that parameter should be
> > removed.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ethereal-dev mailing list
> > Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ethereal-dev mailing list
> > Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev