[Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping@xxxxxx>]

Gerald Combs wrote:

> Ulf Lamping wrote:
>
>  
>
> > This page splits the port range into 100 ports per page, but I think,
> > that the overview page is a bit too "large".
> >
> > What about changing this to have more ports per page, I could think of
> > 250 ports per page, so the overview page could have 1000 ports per line.
> >
> > So the lines in the overview page would look like:
> >
> > 0-249   250-499   500-749   750-999
> > 1000-1249   1250-1499   1500-1759   1750-1999
> > ...
> >
> > Well, the formatting will be a bit nicer at the wiki, but you'll get the
> > point.
> >
> > Of course, this will increase the number of ports in the subpages.
> >    
>
> Another list (http://www.bekkoame.ne.jp/~s_ita/port/port1-99.html)
> distributes the ports unevenly, presumably because there are a lot
> low-numbered well-known ports and very few high-numbered ones.  A
> similar layout might make sense in our case.
>
>  
Yes, that sounds reasonable, too.

Regards, ULFL