[Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping@xxxxxx>]

Martin Regner wrote:

> Oliver Biot wrote:
>  
>
> > Today we can only produce PDML output in tethereal (with the -Tpdml
> > command-line option). I guess it is not that complicated to add support
> >    
> for
>  
>
> > PDML output in Ethereal, unless I ignore the consequences of packet
> > reassembly?
> >    
>
> Yes I would like to be able to get PDML-output  from Ethereal.
>
> I'm using the PDML output for certain things and will probably use it much
> more in the future.
> I'm often using Tethereal from some batch scripts to produce the PDML output
> and do some post-processing.
>
> But in some cases it would be easier to do PDML output from Ethereal since I
> may have to change some "Decode As..." settings
> based on the contents in the sniffing and then it is a bit annoying that I
> cannot do the output directly from Ethereal.
>
>  
Well, the biggest problem is getting it at the right place into the 
Ethereal GUI.

It would be relatively easy to put it as an option into the print 
dialog, as the PDML output is implemented as a kind of print output 
filter/transformation.

However, this would be really poor in a usability point of view, as no 
one would expect it there.

So the right place for it would be "File->Export->PDML" in the menu, but 
this would require implementing a new dialog (with packet range 
selection and such like in the print dialog).

Regards, ULFL

BTW: what are you doing with the PDML output when you have generated it?