Ethereal-dev: RE: [Ethereal-dev] Changes for sip-t decoding

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: Chernishov Yury <Chernishov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 08:45:29 +0600
Hi!

Does SIP-T part works for you? I mean multupart/mixed dissection.
As far as I can judge, packet-multupart.c receive wrong data
from packet-sip.c about "boundary" value
(the problem is "space" character before "bondary" value)!
Therefore packet-multipart.c can not separate
different multipart from each other correctly!

Can somebody send me trace for ethereal, if it works for you?




-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Morriss [mailto:jeff_morriss@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 8:16 PM
To: Ethereal development
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Changes for sip-t decoding




Anders Broman (AL/EAB) wrote:

> Hi,
> Note that this is only affecting SIP-T.
> With the present code a line in the GUI containing  a SIP/application/isup
would look like :
> 
> 13 0.302286  10.28.2.11  10.28.1.11  SIP/ISUP Status: 183 Session
Progress, ISUP:reserved
> Without "ISUP" it'd look :
> 
> 13 0.302286  10.28.2.11  10.28.1.11  SIP/ISUP Status: 183 Session
Progress, reserved
> 
> I thought with the former it was clearer that "reserved" belonged to the
ISUP dissection rather than to SIP.
> But feel free to change it if you like, I have no strong preferenses
either way.

Oops, my bad.  I thought this change was in 'dissect_isup()', not in 
'dissect_application_isup()' (I keep forgetting that there are multiple 
entry points in the ISUP dissector).  Sorry for the noise.

_______________________________________________
Ethereal-dev mailing list
Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev