Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Directory settings
Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.
From: "Mark H. Wood" <mwood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 09:45:45 -0500 (EST)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Guy Harris wrote: > On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 09:43:02PM +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote: > > I'm not sure if that's the right thing to do. The data in the profile > > directory on win32 will be copied to the server each time > > you do a logoff, so this will copy probably a huge amount of data. > > ...unless you don't have a roaming profile. How many people do? Not nearly enough. :-( > Also, isn't that where *most* applications put their data, by default - > in some directory under your profile directory? (Presumably that's why > profile directories get put under "Documents and Settings" in NT 5.x.) Yes, and they're wrong. The profile, proper, is for tiny things like shortcuts and other settings and preferences (think dotfiles), not for huge working files. Template files and such should go into %APPDATA%\vendor\product , for example. %USERPROFILE% is broken down into subsections which can be individually redirected via policy, and administrators of big Windows installations [touches cap ruefully] will thank you for paying attention to policy issues. I'd say the best default for capture files would be to ask the shell for the My Documents path. That's another place which can be separately redirected, and it's appropriate for files which are used by an application but are not an essential part of its setup. You need to ask the shell because these paths are localizable. The distinction between startup/operational data for the product's own use, and user data, is always important, but it's especially important to think about it in the Windows context, both because they are kept topologically close together in the Windows model, and because incorrect placement of large files in a roaming profile will put a severe strain on the "briefcase reconciler" and lead to unpleasant logon/logoff delays. BTW *scratch* files should go in %TEMP%, if that wasn't obvious. Not only can this be redirected, it is by default excluded from copy-in/copy-out along with all the other stuff in %USERPROFILE%\LocalSettings. Some of these nice distinctions weren't implemented in earlier versions of Win32, but I figure that anyone who is still running Windows 95 in 2004 gets what he deserves. > > Also some people reported, that the working dir must be the same as the > > exe's dir, to work together with GTK-Wimp, > > however, I didn't tested this myself. > > That sounds like a severe botch in GTK-Wimp. If it's a question of the GTK-Wimp libraries being on the PATH, consider having the installer add ethereal to the list of known applications with an augmented PATH. That is, make a key in HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\AppPaths with the name "ethereal.exe" (or whatever), a default value of the full path to the Ethereal executable, and a value "Path" being a string containing paths to be appended to PATH whenever ethereal.exe is run. This way you avoid gunking up the default PATH with stuff that has no significance to anything else. This is probably better than plunking the GTK-Wimp libraries into a system directory, given Microsoft's current ideas about the route out of DLL Hell. You're quite right that GTK-Wimp shouldn't be this fragile. Possibly GTK should add its libraries to the Known DLLs list, but that's a question for the GTK team. ++++++++++++++++ I used to just tell people to "go read the Logo Requirements", but Microsoft seem to have scattered this information across bits of the Visual Studio documentation and what is now called the Application Specification. You can get the AppSpec from Microsoft (as a Word file, grrr) at: http://msdn.microsoft.com/winlogo/ - -- Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mwood@xxxxxxxxx MS Windows *is* user-friendly, but only for certain values of "user". -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: pgpenvelope 2.10.2 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/ iD8DBQFAQ0yds/NR4JuTKG8RAufUAJ4t4K3El4mGOe+LTDpGxGn+DGsvugCfQvny vGi6e7KUTh98/6rQWc1aJHA= =Cw8k -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ethereal-dev] Directory settings
- From: John McDermott
- Re: [Ethereal-dev] Directory settings
- From: Guy Harris
- Re: [Ethereal-dev] Directory settings
- Prev by Date: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Plugin API - ASN.1 BER helper
- Next by Date: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Capture ringbuffer behaviour, 2nd proposal
- Previous by thread: Re: [Ethereal-dev] GUI: Thoughts on status pane
- Next by thread: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Directory settings
- Index(es):