Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Capture ringbuffer behaviour, 2nd proposal

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: "Lars Ruoff" <lars.ruoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:23:43 +0100
Sounds very good to me, except that you shouldnt normally use the term "ring
buffer" at all, if you dont come back to the first file, do you?
Replace it by "Use multiple files"? and perhaps add the term ring buffer to
last entry?
---Capture file(s)---------------------------------------------
File: ___________________ Browse
O Use multiple files:
 X Next capture file every 1______ kilobyte(s)
 O Next capture file every 1______ second(s)
 X Back to first file after 2______ files (Ring Buffer)

Lars


> After getting some more responses to my first proposal, here is the next
one:
>
> ---Capture file(s)---------------------------------------------
> File: ___________________ Browse
> O Use ring buffer
> X Next capture file every 1______ kilobyte(s)
> O Next capture file every 1______ second(s)
> X Back to first file after 2______ files
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> ---Capture limit(s)---------------------------------------------
> O Stop capture after 1______ packet(s)
> O Stop capture after 1______ kilobyte(s)
> O Stop capture after 1______ second(s)
> O Stop capture after 1______ file(s)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Any comments?
>
> Regards, ULFL