[Yaniv Kaul <ykaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Lines 840-844, in packet-socks.c:
   else if ( hash_info->state == AuthReply){    /* V5 User Auth reply */
       hash_info->cmd_reply_row = get_packet_ptr;
       if (check_col(pinfo->cinfo, COL_INFO))
            col_append_str(pinfo->cinfo, COL_INFO, " User 
authentication reply");
       hash_info->state = V5Command;

The code assumes that the response for a an authentication request is a 
V5Command. However, it's usually an authentication response - and the 
authentication subnegotiation has its own version number ('1', according 
to RFC 1929).  This causes it not to interpret the command properly (as 
it see the version is '1' and '5', it won't continue to dissect the packet).

I've seen servers replying with version '5', but I think it's a faulty 
server - some clients won't be able to connect to it, if they expect the 
version they sent ('1)' and the version they received ('5') to match...

Snoops will be available upon request.