Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] MSVC warnings in packet-h225.c

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 10:39:22 +0100
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 09:11:39AM +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Some new(?) MSVC compiler warnings:
> 
> packet-h225.c(10326) : warning C4018: '>' : Konflikt zwischen signed und unsigned
> packet-h225.c(10328) : warning C4018: '>' : Konflikt zwischen signed und unsigned

Here's a more complete list (from gcc with extra warnings):

packet-h225.c:1282: warning: pointer targets in passing arg 9 of `dissect_per_choice' differ in signedness
packet-h225.c:1571: warning: pointer targets in passing arg 9 of `dissect_per_choice' differ in signedness
packet-h225.c:1604: warning: pointer targets in passing arg 9 of `dissect_per_choice' differ in signedness
packet-h225.c:1637: warning: pointer targets in passing arg 9 of `dissect_per_choice' differ in signedness
packet-h225.c:1746: warning: pointer targets in passing arg 9 of `dissect_per_choice' differ in signedness
packet-h225.c:1770: warning: pointer targets in passing arg 9 of `dissect_per_choice' differ in signedness
packet-h225.c:1797: warning: pointer targets in passing arg 9 of `dissect_per_choice' differ in signedness
packet-h225.c:1825: warning: pointer targets in passing arg 9 of `dissect_per_choice' differ in signedness
packet-h225.c:2395: warning: pointer targets in passing arg 9 of `dissect_per_choice' differ in signedness
packet-h225.c:5152: warning: pointer targets in passing arg 9 of `dissect_per_choice' differ in signedness
packet-h225.c:5310: warning: pointer targets in passing arg 9 of `dissect_per_choice' differ in signedness
packet-h225.c:6099: warning: pointer targets in passing arg 9 of `dissect_per_choice' differ in signedness
packet-h225.c:10326: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
packet-h225.c:10328: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned


-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.