Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] fixes for nsis-installer script and makefile

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 11:40:13 -0800
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 03:17:13PM +0100, Lars Roland wrote:
> -EXE=../../ethereal.exe ../../tethereal.exe ../../editcap.exe \
> +!IFDEF GTK1
> +DEST=ethereal
> +GTK_DIR=$(GTK1_DIR)
> +!ELSE
> +DEST=ethereal2
> +GTK_DIR=$(GTK2_DIR)
> +!ENDIF
> +
> +EXE=../../$(DEST).exe ../../tethereal.exe ../../editcap.exe \
>  	../../text2pcap.exe ../../mergecap.exe
>  DLL=../../wiretap/wiretap-$(WTAP_VERSION).dll
>  DOC=../../doc/ethereal.html		\
> @@ -49,16 +57,6 @@
>  DELIVERABLES=$(EXE) $(DLL) $(DOC) $(GPL) $(HELP) $(PLUGINS)
>  
>  
> -
> -!IFDEF GTK1
> -DEST=ethereal
> -GTK_DIR=$(GTK1_DIR)
> -!ELSE
> -DEST=ethereal2
> -GTK_DIR=$(GTK2_DIR)
> -!ENDIF
> -
> -
>  $(DEST)-setup-$(VERSION).exe : ethereal.nsi $(DELIVERABLES) Makefile.nmake
>  	$(MAKENSIS) \
>  !IF "$(MAKENSIS_MODERN_UI)" != ""

I think there was some discussion as to what version numbers the
Ethereal executable image name should reflect.

Was it concluded that the image name should include "2" if Ethereal was
built for GTK+ 2.x?

And, if we make GTK+ 2.x rather than 1.3[.x] the standard version for
Ethereal builds at some point, should the Ethereal executable still have
that "2" in its name?