Ethereal-dev: Re: PDML from tethereal, was Re: [Ethereal-dev] New "matches" (PCRE support) pat

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:41:28 -0800

On Dec 8, 2003, at 1:14 PM, Gilbert Ramirez wrote:

On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 20:24, Guy Harris wrote:
Should we force the verbose flag on when "-T ps" or "-T pdml" is
specified? (Actually, does "-T ps" require "-V"? I think we can print summaries in PostScript from Ethereal - if not, that's arguably a bug.)


Verbose flag: I don't know. I chose not to, thinking that unexpected
behavior is bad; i.e., the use requests one behavior (unknowingly) and
gets another. It's unimportant to me... if we think -V should be forced
with -Tpdml, then fine.

I see "-V" as something that matters only for output that can show summaries or detail, such as printable text output; it looks as if PDML is, by definition, detail, so I'd see "-T pdml" as generating the same output regardless of whether "-V" is specified or not.

(I could see somebody asking, when they see

	tethereal: Using -Tpdml requires -V

why, if Tethereal knows that you need "-V", it doesn't just turn it on for you rather than telling you that you have to specify it.)