[Pierre JUHEN <pierre.juhen@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I am writing a TCP dissector for a private protocol that uses TCP 
desegmentation.

Using it, I found out that the TCP dissector labels "[IIlegal segments]" 
segments where
the sender retransmits a frame that overlap the previous (lost) one, but 
is longer.

Therefore, the TCP dissectors sets the FD_TOOLONGFRAGMENT and 
FD_MULTIPLETAILS flags,
taht leads to the "[IIlegal segments]"  message.

On a pure TCP standard point of view, this seems not being illegal.

Thank you for your advice.

__________________________

Proposed patch for "reassemble.c"

--- reassemble.c.old    2003-08-29 03:54:53.000000000 +0200
+++ reassemble.c        2003-10-13 22:24:06.000000000 +0200
@@ -1582,12 +1582,11 @@
static gboolean
show_fragment_errs_in_col(fragment_data *fd_head, const fragment_items 
*fit,
    packet_info *pinfo)
{
-       if (fd_head->flags & (FD_OVERLAPCONFLICT
-               |FD_MULTIPLETAILS|FD_TOOLONGFRAGMENT) ) {
+       if (fd_head->flags & (FD_OVERLAPCONFLICT) ) {
               if (check_col(pinfo->cinfo, COL_INFO)) {
-                       col_add_fstr(pinfo->cinfo, COL_INFO,
+                       col_append_fstr(pinfo->cinfo, COL_INFO,
                               "[Illegal %s]", fit->tag);
                       return TRUE;
               }
       }