[Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Oct 8, 2003, at 5:33 PM, Guy Harris wrote:

> >  Third, the code miss a content-type filter I do not plan to write, is
> >  it still acceptable when the options are switched off by default?
> Perhaps, although it does run the risk of reassembling a really large 
> amount of content even if the user doesn't care.  We can always add a 
> way to specify what content types should be reassembled if that's a 
> problem.
Perhaps we should only reassemble content if we're going to pass it to 
a subdissector.