["Mark H. Wood" <mwood@xxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Would anyone care to comment on my point that a language for describing
packets in terms of their bits and bytes may not be appropriate for
describing flows of information in terms of the packets which carry them?
This could help to explain why some efforts are still working on flow
issues such as reassembly.

- -- 
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer   mwood@xxxxxxxxx
MS Windows *is* user-friendly, but only for certain values of "user".
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: pgpenvelope 2.10.2 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/

iD8DBQE/Rhx8s/NR4JuTKG8RAhqiAJ9BKb1wBAGJ0rMknvhzMgLvL38ZHwCfY4Do
JwJ+Va8VE3NJybM6dJtUtXg=
=BIXV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----