The hash just contains an entry for the conversation, EID value, and name.
This should be constant for the trace.
I changed the patch to not utilize the visited flag and to instead leave
the hash until the trace file is either closed or reloaded.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 01:35:47PM -0700, Greg Morris wrote:
> I hate
to appear dumb but is the reason for this because after the
> trace has
been opened and dissected then if you filter the trace then
> the lookup
will not be processed on these packets because they already
> have the
flag set?
That's one reason.
Another reason is that if you
subsequently click on a packet the lookup
will not be processed on that
packet because it already has the flag
set, and if you ask Ethereal to print
the packets the lookup will not be
processed on that packet because it
already has the flag set, etc..
> If so would it be better to leave
the hash until the trace is closed?
If only one value is associated with
a given EID (i.e., if the
association of values with EIDs doesn't change over
time), yes, that'd
be the right
answer.
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-dev
mailing list
Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev