Sorry for the confusion, I actually sent the same email twice last
night. The first email was sent from a non-subscribed email address,
which I thought was dropped, but it seems that it was just delayed until
the list admin approved it.
Thanks for committing the previous patch.
-Jason
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 19:54, Guy Harris wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 12:31:23AM -0600, Jason Greene wrote:
> > This patch fixes decoding of the newSuperior attribute of an LDAPv3
> > modrdn request.
>
> hostname$ patch </tmp/patch
> Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
> The text leading up to this was:
> --------------------------
> |Index: packet-ldap.c
> |===================================================================
> |RCS file: /cvsroot/ethereal/packet-ldap.c,v
> |retrieving revision 1.48
> |diff -u -r1.48 packet-ldap.c
> |--- packet-ldap.c 2002/11/12 21:37:22 1.48
> |+++ packet-ldap.c 2002/11/25 06:17:50
> --------------------------
> Patching file packet-ldap.c using Plan A...
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y]
>
> I.e., so did your previous patch, which I applied earlier today.
--
Jason Greene <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<jason@xxxxxxx>
There is no opinion so absurd that some philosopher will not express it.
-- Marcus Tullius Cicero, "Ad familiares"