Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Request: Change the allowed license of plugins

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 01:03:22 +0100
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 06:59:13AM +1100, Brad Hards wrote:
> Alternative Proposal - Another "plug-in" interface.
...
> This avoids the need for a "click-through", since Ethereal will accept 
> anything over that API, but _everything_ will be checked. (Again, think 
> client-server).
> 
> The downside is that such an interface needs to be documented and build 
> (ideally in that order:).

We are talking about so much infrastructure that it isn't fun. It's also
bad from an infrastructure point of view: Bloat "just" for political
reasons. Actually, I really dislike that approach. One project that
has similar problems is ghostscript (gpl) and the rather ugle things
hp is (was?) doing to attach proprietary drivers to this software.

  Ciao
        Jörg
--
Joerg Mayer                                          <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
I found out that "pro" means "instead of" (as in proconsul). Now I know
what proactive means.