Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Ethereal version not correct after build based on current CVS

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: "Greg Morris" <GMORRIS@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:35:12 -0600
Joerg,
 
I assume you mean the root of my build directory....
 
Files containing 0.9.6
 
ethereal/config.h
ethereal/configure.in
ethereal/news
ethereal/config.nmake
ethereal/changelog
ethereal/epan/config.h
ethereal/epan/configure.in

Files containing 0.9.4
ethereal/prefs.obj
ethereal/tethereal.obj
ethereal/news
ethereal/ethereal.exe
ethereal/mergecap.exe
ethereal/changelog
ethereal/tethereal.exe
ethereal/packet-ajp13.c
ethereal/epan/ethereal.lib
ethereal/epan/plugins.obj
ethereal/gtk/main.obj
ethereal/gtk/libui.lib
 
Remember I am building on Win32 with Microsoft visual C++ version 6.x. I build with the command nmake makefile.nmake. I have already ran the cleanbld.bat to ensure Win32 compatibility. I have also tried deleting all the *.obj, *.lib, and *.dll files within each directory and performed a new build with no success.
 
Thanks,
Greg

>>> Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx> 08/26/02 02:15PM >>>
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 02:04:34PM -0600, Greg Morris wrote:
> Excuse my ignorance. I am on running on a windows environment with
> cygwin. I tried to use which but it isn't giving me any information
> other then the name of ethereal.exe no date or anything. I am sure that
> the exe that I am executing is the one that I just built with todays
> date.

Hmm, when you do a "grep 0.9.6 *" in the toplevel directory, which files
contain valid hits? What to you get with 0.9.4?

Ciao
     J�rg

--
Joerg Mayer                                          <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
I found out that "pro" means "instead of" (as in proconsul). Now I know
what proactive means.